Reference Centre
Return to the Antenna Application Notes
Overview
Remote IoT installations are often deployed in public, unmanned or exposed locations where antennas and cables may be vulnerable to accidental damage, tampering or vandalism. This guide explains three practical methods for reducing the risk of antenna damage while maintaining reliable cellular connectivity.
Remote installations fitted with cellular telemetry equipment are often deployed in locations where the equipment is unattended for long periods.
Typical examples include:
These systems often rely on cellular communication because it provides a practical and cost-effective method of connecting remote equipment to central systems.
However, externally mounted antennas and visible RF cables can become vulnerable points in the installation.
This guide explains:
Expected Result
At the end of this guide the user will understand how to reduce antenna tampering risk while maintaining suitable cellular signal performance.
Cellular antenna installations may be vulnerable when:
| Risk Area | Potential Issue |
|---|---|
| Visible antennas | May attract unwanted attention |
| Exposed RF cables | May be cut, pulled or damaged |
| Low mounting height | Easy physical access |
| External connectors | Possible removal or tampering |
| Public locations | Increased vandalism risk |
Low profile antennas are designed to sit close to the mounting surface and reduce the physical exposure of the antenna.
They are typically fitted using a through-hole mounting arrangement where the fixing passes through the enclosure.
This helps because:
Traditional whip, stubby or rod antennas may be easy to identify, bend, unscrew or damage.
A low profile antenna provides a more robust installation because the antenna sits close to the surface and normally requires access to the inside of the enclosure for removal.
Low profile antennas are suitable for:
Many low profile antennas can support multiple wireless technologies within one enclosure.
These may include:
| Technology | Typical Use |
|---|---|
| Cellular | LTE, 5G, LTE-M and NB-IoT communication |
| GNSS | Positioning and location tracking |
| WiFi | Local wireless communication |
| ISM | Short-range industrial wireless systems |
Use a low profile antenna when the installation requires:
Important Note
Low profile antennas can improve physical robustness, but the selected antenna must still support the required frequency bands and installation environment.
Raising the antenna above ground level can improve cellular performance and reduce the likelihood of tampering.
Cellular communication normally benefits from improved line-of-sight conditions.
Elevating the antenna can therefore provide two advantages:
An elevated antenna may experience:
This can improve the overall communication performance of the installation.
Mounting the antenna higher makes it harder to reach and therefore less vulnerable to casual damage or tampering.
Suitable elevated mounting points may include:
When antennas are elevated, the RF cable may become a vulnerable part of the installation.
Visible cable routed along poles, posts, drainpipes or building surfaces can be targeted or accidentally damaged.
Where possible, route cables:
| Cable Routing Method | Benefit |
|---|---|
| Internal pole routing | Reduces cable exposure |
| Protective conduit | Improves mechanical protection |
| Underground routing | Minimises visible cable access |
| Rear-entry enclosure routing | Reduces external tampering points |
Outdoor wall or pole mount antennas are suitable when the antenna needs to be positioned away from the equipment enclosure.
These antennas can provide:
Longer low-loss cables may be used where the antenna needs to be positioned away from the modem or router.
For very weak signal locations, a directional antenna may be suitable.
A directional antenna can be pointed towards the serving cell site to improve received signal strength.
This is useful for:
Before finalising antenna position, perform a cellular survey where possible.
A network analyser can help identify:
Important Note
The best physical location for vandal resistance is not always the best RF location. The final installation should balance security, cable protection and signal performance.
Exterior antennas may be exposed to electrical transients.
For elevated outdoor antennas, consider surge protection in the RF feed line.
A surge arrestor can help reduce the risk of damage to downstream communication equipment caused by high-voltage transient events.
In some installations, the best way to reduce vandalism risk is to hide the antenna completely.
Internal antennas may be used when the equipment enclosure allows RF signals to pass through.
This approach removes the visible external antenna and reduces the number of exposed components.
Internal antennas may be suitable when:
Internal antennas may not be suitable when:
Important Note
RF signals do not transmit well through metal enclosures. If the equipment is housed inside a metal case, an internal antenna is unlikely to provide reliable performance unless a suitable external or through-hole antenna arrangement is used.
Internal antenna options may include:
| Antenna Type | Typical Use |
|---|---|
| Embedded antenna | Integrated inside the equipment enclosure |
| Adhesive antenna | Mounted to the inside of a plastic enclosure or window |
| FPC antenna | Flexible internal antenna for compact products |
| PCB antenna | Internal antenna with cable and connector |
For best performance, internal antennas should be positioned:
Poor placement can significantly reduce signal strength and signal quality.
The best approach depends on the installation environment.
| Installation Requirement | Recommended Approach |
|---|---|
| Public outdoor equipment | Low profile through-hole antenna |
| Weak signal area | Elevated outdoor or directional antenna |
| Plastic enclosure | Internal embedded or adhesive antenna |
| Metal enclosure | External low profile or through-hole antenna |
| Remote rural site | Elevated directional antenna with protected cable route |
| High vandalism risk | Hidden or low profile antenna with internal cable routing |
Field trials are essential before final deployment.
A field trial should confirm:
The final solution should provide a practical compromise between:
| Mistake | Potential Issue |
|---|---|
| Using an exposed whip antenna in a public area | High risk of damage or removal |
| Leaving RF cable visible | Cable may be cut, pulled or damaged |
| Mounting the antenna too low | Easy access and weaker signal visibility |
| Installing an internal antenna inside a metal enclosure | Poor or no RF performance |
| Ignoring field testing | Unproven real-world performance |
| Using long unprotected cable routes | Increased vulnerability and RF loss |
| Check | Complete |
|---|---|
| Vandalism risk reviewed | |
| Antenna mounting style selected | |
| Signal strength checked | |
| Signal quality checked | |
| Cable route protected | |
| Enclosure material reviewed | |
| Outdoor sealing reviewed | |
| Surge protection considered | |
| Field trial completed |
| Tip | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Use a low profile antenna | Reduces visibility and improves mechanical robustness |
| Elevate the antenna | Improves signal performance and reduces accessibility |
| Hide the antenna | Removes visible antenna hardware where enclosure conditions allow |
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 | Assess installation vandalism risk |
| 2 | Select low profile, elevated or hidden antenna strategy |
| 3 | Protect RF cable routes |
| 4 | Confirm antenna performance with a site survey |
| 5 | Complete a field trial before full deployment |
Reference Centre
Return to the Antenna Application Notes